Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #1097, comment 10


Ignore:
Timestamp:
07/25/13 20:15:28 (7 years ago)
Author:
sleske
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #1097, comment 10

    initial v1  
    1 Yes, that does look silly. The reason given for removing the ISO code from the relation is that the relation does not include all of France, but only the European part. However, there is no other relation for France :-/. Looks like pointless nitpicking to me...
     1Well, there is some logic behind removing the ISO code. The relation above is only for the French mainland, without the ex-colonies etc. There is another [http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/11980 relation for the whole of France]. This relation contains sub-relations (in two or three levels, I think) which together cover France.
     2
     3This is explained in the OSM Wiki: [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France_boundary_pyramidal_construction France boundary pyramidal construction]. It looks like we should use that relation for Navit. However, I'm not sure if we can process such a nested relation.
     4
     5And BTW, there is also a [http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2978650 relation for Norway] with ISO tag. This one is not even nested :-).